There is no way for us to know how future historians will look back on these dramatic and tumultuous times we find ourselves living in. We should know, by now, that they won’t be kind.

Story continues below

As I write this, smoke from runaway wildfires on the west coast hangs in the sky above Toronto. Meanwhile, stronger and more frequent hurricanes barrage the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean. Yet, the urgent and worrying problem of climate change doesn’t even rate among the top three crises this year.

The year will be best remembered for the COVID-19 pandemic. It has caused the greatest global recession since the Great Depression. SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind the pandemic, has so far killed nearly one million people worldwide.

Yet, there is a significant, vocal contingent, both in the United States and here in Canada, who believe everything I just wrote above is an elaborate hoax or conspiracy. What they find most offensive is the idea that, to help contain the virus’ spread, we should all wear some type of covering over our mouth and nose when in public, which they, in response, absolutely refuse to do, leading to the deaths of others who encounter them, and the further, uncontrollable spread of the virus.

The second thing this year will be remembered for will be the result of the upcoming presidential election, happening next month in the United States. The incumbent is Donald Trump, a man who has so thoroughly mismanaged his country’s response to this virus as to leave the rest of the world to conclude the United States’ hopes of containing it are a total lost cause, leaving borders closed to Americans for the foreseeable future.

While Joe Biden may not be anyone’s first choice as an alternative to Donald Trump, the answer of who would best lead the country out of this mess of those two options should be obvious to all.

Yet, there is a significant, vocal contingent who believe Biden is part of a global conspiracy that involves Jeffrey Epstein, pizza parlours and kidnapping children in the night. They believe Trump – a man who called Jeffrey Epstein a “terrific guy” – is, somehow, the leader who will protect them from this conspiracy.

The third thing this year will be remembered for is the wave of protests in response to the horrific murder of George Floyd by police officer Derek Chauvin. Before Floyd’s murder, countless other Black Americans had been summarily executed by police officers, including – but not limited to – Eric Garner, Michael Brown, Tamir Rice – a 12-year-old boy playing in the street – and Breonna Taylor, who was shot by eight police officers conducting a “no knock” warrant on the wrong home. Jacob Blake, recently shot seven times in the back as he walked to his car, his children inside, was fortunate to survive his encounter with police, though at the cost of becoming paralyzed from the waist down.

The protests of 2020 have demanded that Floyd’s death – among the countless others – be the catalyst for desperately needed reform of police departments in the United States, as well as here in Canada, to deal with what are not isolated incidents or “bad apples” but systemic issues with racism and abuses of power and authority.

The response by police departments to these protests has been heavy handed, militarized and violent, only further making the case for why such reform is necessary.

Yet, there is a significant, vocal contingent, both in the United States and here in Canada, who believe that saying “Black lives matter” is a threat to their way of life. The contrarian replies of “all lives matter” suggests “Black lives matter” is a call for a different kind of supremacy, rather than a reaction to police officers who clearly believe the opposite.

Over and over again, we see evidence that there is a significant minority who live in their own reality. A reality defined for them by anonymous social media posts. A reality that does not require citation, facts or sources. A reality that tells them anyone who disagrees with them is wrong, stupid or, worse, a threat.

They have been conditioned by social media to believe that sources do not matter, so long as we are being told what we want to hear: If someone whose politics I don’t agree with says something, it must be wrong. Therefore, there is no virus, there is no racism against Black people by the police and Donald Trump is doing an excellent job.

But none of those things are true.

History cares about facts. The facts are that people are dead, and more are dying every day.

History will not be sympathetic to those of us who rejected facts because we were busy scoring points on our ideological enemies.

Now, more than ever, we need well-funded journalism to help us separate the facts from fiction.

And, hopefully, to help us in bringing some of our fellow citizens back to reality.

We may not know what’s ahead, but I look forward to REM, in our own small way, being a part of that solution.


  1. Respectfully Mr. Molls it’s clear from this piece that as head of this publication you are not an objective journalist, right from the start you’ve set the narrative and have supported it with little more than your opinions. I for one have spent years listening, reading and trying to understand the complex issues that are at play and your simple assessment of them are not supported by the data. Furthermore you opine about those who disagree with you and others who share your beliefs that “A reality that tells them anyone who disagrees with them is wrong, stupid or, worse, a threat” yet your very tone clearly comes across as the same, it’s condescending to them. An unbiased journalist is one who is to be “objective” lay out the facts on both sides and let their readers/listeners/viewers decide which “narrative” they are willing to believe, sadly these days little of this happens. If you take an honest read of your article, you’ve left little room for those who disagree with you, I would go on further to say that you’ve vilified them throughout.

    At the end of the day it’s your publication however I always take the approach that those who disagree with me are “good people with bad ideas” and vigorous discussion can only benefit both of us. From what I’ve seen of journalism as of late especially it’s a belief that those who disagree with them are “bad people with bad ideas” which ultimately leaves little room or reason to have dialogue.


  2. This publisher’s page article has “everything” to do with real estate.
    Think of it in terms of union automobile on strike situations as an analogy. It isn’t just the car manufacturers who are affected. It’s all the subset cousin industries right down to the assorted supply providers of the covered buttons on the seat covers and the overhead light covers. A long string back to the design engineer and related staff. No one’s doing business when affected by the strike.

    Not unlike when real estate market crashes caused by exacerbated high interest rates on mortgages allowing for big dividends for shareholders and over-bonused executives when their customers are losing their mortgaged homes; even increased mortgage insurance, land transfer taxes, or housing markets eviscerated by government intervention as to who can quality for what massive changes… “everyone” in contiguous, related, industries suffers. Right down to paint and bath mats, the retailers, the wholesalers, the manufacturers, the catalogues that promo the products, the related product artists and photographers, and all the staff related to each. Suddenly none have jobs where one supported the other in a domino effect.

    I am totally apolitical but when what William describes is ultimately the real world spinning out of control, indeed seeming to be preparing to self destruct as in implode, either politically or traumatizing terror-related becomes the way of the day to day world we had all better wake up and smell the coffee.

    You can’t put the genie back in the container, likewise try to stop a run-away train. Any and all of the above affects the real estate market, as does the adjective bespoke applied to the current publisher page article. Custom-designed trauma. Some folks are more easily led or influenced than others by the monkey see monkey do theory. It’s not hard to see the in your face results.

    Certainly food for thought, relative to the real estate industry and how it is impacted by world events, trauma driven.

    Carolyne L ?

  3. Real estate revolves with what happens worldwide… The USA election, Covid 19, Climate change, and even Oil prices & pipelines for those that live in western Canada all will affect the world economy.

    Well written William. I for one do hope this article is viewed by more eyes than what is normally viewed.

    Thank you!

  4. ??? What in the world does this have to do with real estate ??? ….I’d say more but I’ll just leave it there.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here