A new study by economist Will Dunning says for those who are able to secure a sufficient down payment, it is more financially beneficial to buy a home in Canada than to rent over the long term, in 91 per cent of cases analyzed. The scenarios assume the owner is able to provide a 20-per-cent down payment. The study was commissioned by Royal LePage.

Story continues below

“Historically, home ownership has been very profitable for Canadians, many of whom have factored their real estate investments into their retirement planning. Owning a home is widely viewed as a means to save money and build equity,” says Karen Yolevski, COO at Royal LePage.

The study uses price data for 278 scenarios (broken out by city and housing type) across the country and approaches the question “Is it better to buy or rent?” from various angles, using historical data, future projections and viewing home ownership as an investment.

“This research tests a belief that is held by a lot of Canadians, that owning is better financially than renting. And it finds that this belief is very often correct,” says Dunning in a news release.

While the total monthly costs of owning a home may be higher than renting, mortgage payments comprise principal and interest, and the principal component can be seen as a form of forced saving. While the homeowner has to pay the full amount each month, the principal is not a true cost, Dunning says. What’s more, the interest component is largest in the first month and gradually decreases over the life of the loan, effectively increasing the amount of forced saving each month.

In 253 out of 278 cases studied (91 per cent), the net cost of ownership (the total ownership cost minus the saving that occurs through principal repayment) is lower than the cost of renting. In the report, this factor is referred to as the “ownership advantage”. As of the second quarter of this year, on average the net home ownership cost was $769 per month less than the cost of renting an equivalent dwelling. In the nine per cent of scenarios where renting was more beneficial than buying, cases were concentrated in luxury homes in expensive neighbourhood pockets, says the report. The monthly savings were minimal for this demographic at $245.

“While Canadians do want their homes to appreciate, potential homebuyers will find it reassuring that significant price appreciation is not necessary for ownership to be financially worthwhile,” says Yolevski. “There are other benefits to owning a home, in addition to the financial advantages. Owning a property allows more freedom and stability than renting. As a homeowner, you do not have to worry about the landlord hiking up the rent or forcing you to move. And homeowners have the ability to make a place their own, with renovations or decor. I believe most Canadians would agree that owning a home is as much about laying down roots in a community and making memories with family, as it is about financial security.”

The study tested various scenarios. This includes a mortgage renewal in five years, at an increased interest rate (3.62 per cent, which is based on the highest interest rate seen during the study period from the fourth quarter of 2014 to the present). Even in that scenario, home ownership is expected to remain more affordable than renting in most situations, says the report.

To varying degrees, Canadians think of their homes as an investment, and not just a place to live. The study calculated how home ownership might perform as an investment, making varying assumptions about how much values might change during the coming 10 years. The calculations found that even with a 10-per-cent decline in home prices, approximately half of the homeowners studied would still see a positive rate of return on investment, while the other half would break even or see a modest loss as an investment. If there is no growth in values, ownership would result in a positive rate of return on investment in a majority of cases. Other scenarios in which values rise show increasingly attractive rates of return, the study says.

The analysis includes assumptions about the costs of buying and selling homes (closing costs, lawyers’ and real estate agents’ fees and land transfer taxes) and the major ongoing costs incurred by homeowners (utilities, repairs, homeowners’ insurance and condominium fees, where applicable).

1 COMMENT

  1. Yes, this is a great article, but it ain’t all sunshine and lollipops owning property. The current mortgage rates are really artificially low.
    As young homeowners since the late 1970′ we know this well. Talk about worry raising a young family with rates around 20%. Scrimping and saving became our modus operundi, and is still with us.
    We, as realtors, should be very concerned that the Liberals and NDP want to put capital gains tax on our principal residences and increase it on revenue properties to pay for their guaranteed income program and the programs introduced since 2015.
    It is not enough that the interest that we are paid on our savings is lower than the rate of inflation, our taxes are some of the highest in the world, or that we have to subsidize renters through rent controls.
    And moving us into cryptocurrency – how could that go wrong?????
    Time to wake up and smell the coffee!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here